4 Culture Elements to Increase the Number of Women Executives

In yesterday’s post I raised the possibility that the number of women in C-level leadership positions may be lower because many women define success differently and therefore may not aspire to these roles. My premise was women tend to desire a multi-dimensional life, which is difficult, if not impossible, to attain as a C-suite executive within the typical business culture today.

Maybe we should re-examine the business culture, rather than expecting women and others to re-define how they view success

If we truly desire a more diverse representation of leaders in the C-Suite, maybe we should re-examine the business culture, rather than expecting women and others to re-define how they view success. What is lacking in the environment that if present might allow more women to find their version of success in the C-suite? A few points to consider:

Humanity at Work

As long as reaching the C-suite requires a singular focus on work to the extent that you must significantly sacrifice (or outsource) many aspects of your personal life, the number of women at that table will remain small. Women tend to be collectors of experiences and enjoy living a multi-faceted life. They want time in their lives to engage with what they value, such as family and friends, and the organizations and activities that they care about.

Richness of engagement is a big part of what women have to offer to business

In fact, this richness of engagement is a big part of what women have to offer to business. Their connection with many communities allows them to bring a broadened perspective to the office, which feeds creativity and innovation. This diversity of perspectives at the table can help prevent the leadership from drinking their own Kool-Aid.

Purpose

Women are more naturally motivated by opportunities to make an impact on something they think is important. They see metrics as an enabling tool and profit as the result of making a successful impact. Cultures that attempt to motivate only through metrics and profit-related compensation models will have difficulty engaging women for the long run.

I often wonder if our purely profit-focused business mindset of the last several decades has resulted in an evolutionary weeding-out of naturally purpose-driven business leaders, regardless of gender.

Cultures that attempt to motivate only through metrics and profit-related compensation models will have difficulty engaging women

Work Flexibility

Although connection and collaboration are critical for any high-functioning team, there shouldn’t be a one-size-fits-all solution to achievement. To create flexibility, use a “maximum appropriate,” versus “minimum necessary” mindset. This flexibility isn’t just about women of course. It’s a critical element to encourage humanity in the workplace.

Use a “maximum appropriate,” versus “minimum necessary” mindset

Career Flexibility

One of the biggest opportunities for change in the corporate culture is the mindset and thinking around career path, particularly for women. We need to value the “chapter” approach to life and recognize all paths to executive leadership as equally valid.

Why not keep talented leaders engaged through chapters of their lives that require another significant focus, by creating smaller, high-impact roles? Why don’t we actively recruit from what I have long thought must be one of the best and biggest sources of available talent: women who have left the corporate world for another chapter in life?

Why not keep talented leaders engaged through chapters of their lives

Instead, the tendency is to view these women’s choices as an indicator that they didn’t have what it takes, and to write them off as “de-railed.”

The opportunity presented in these few ideas isn’t just for women. It’s for all employees and ultimately for business itself. After all, the point isn’t about achieving parity for women in the C-suite. It’s about the benefit that will result for business through inclusion of broader diversity at the leadership table. It’s about more perspectives and better innovation, increased collaboration and improved engagement for all employees. The opportunity here is for better businesses.

Maybe what the women’s movement really brought us is simply the opportunity to choose our own definition of success? What can business learn from the fact that so many women are choosing differently?

Image credit: aroas / 123RF Stock Photo

Passionate believer in people, systems thinking and conscious business. Curious explorer of ideas and connections. Recovering corporate executive helping leaders align and engage their employees… awakening organizational excellence.

  • thechangefactor

    If you changed the focus of this blog from women to ‘the kind of people you really want at the top’ you would see that many of these apply to men as much as women. The problem with a lot of Organisational cultures is not that they only reward men but they reward a certain style of person (male or female). Change the definition of C-suite performance criteria and you may open up a change across the whole business. Change it with a gender intent and in a few years we will have blogs saying ‘the trouble with many women at a C suite level is…..’

  • http://www.movingfrommetowe.com/ KareAnderson

    i agree with “thechangefactor” in noting that both women and men really want the elements you cite here. And, top talent, sought by many organizations, may drive the C-suite / cultural and policy changes that’s are needed to make them happen. Plus, work and career flexibility can be bolstered if companies move from a ladder to a lattice approach, enabling managers and employees to co-design employee career paths that optimize the value of employees for the organization and better meet life-related needs of the employees. Cathy Benko and Molly Anderson wrote a trailblazing book on that approach about which Benko writes here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cathy-benko/post_1660_b_817045.html

  • Pingback: How To Get Best Corporate Executive Training | Markets And Trading()

  • shahid creation

    A very interesting and thought provoking post which i will share
    with my family and students

    http://www.qu.edu.sa

  • Lisa Shelley

    YES! I couldn’t agree with you more. Thanks so much for sharing your perspective. What we are really after is diversity of thought, experience, style, capability and more. Currently we often focus on the visible markers such as gender or culture, as they are easily measurable identifiers and generally do bring people into the fold with the diversity of thought, etc that we are looking for. Unfortunately as we focus on the ‘measurable’ identifier, we all too often lose sight of the deeper meaning and the opportunity that we are really after. My intent was to shift the conversation to something deeper than gender and suggest culture changes that would be more welcoming not only to women, but to a broader spectrum of all employees.

  • There’s a more human way to do business.

    In the Social Age, it’s how we engage with customers, collaborators and strategic partners that matters; it’s how we create workplace optimism that sets us apart; it’s how we recruit, retain (and repel) employees that becomes our differentiator. This isn’t a “people first, profits second” movement, but a “profits as a direct result of putting people first” movement.

  • Contact Us


  •